Tag Archives: gun control

New Q Poll has voters AGAINST Trump/GOP Tax Cut plan by a wide margin…

From the November 15th , 2017 Quinnipiac poll….

24. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling – taxes?

Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Yes    No
Approve              34%    75%     6%    31%    40%    29%    36%    47%
Disapprove           55     11     88     57     50     60     57     38
DK/NA                11     14      6     12     10     11      6     15
AGE IN YRS..............    WHITE.....
18-34  35-49  50-64  65+    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    Hsp
Approve              31%    31%    36%    35%    48%    37%    42%     7%    19%
Disapprove           57     60     56     51     42     52     47     89     66
DK/NA                12      9      8     14     10     12     11      3     16

TREND: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling – taxes?

                     App     Dis     DK/NA
Nov 15, 2017         34      55      11
Oct 11, 2017         37      49      14
May 11, 2017         34      54      13

30. Do you approve or disapprove of the Republican tax plan?

Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Yes    No
Approve              25%    60%     4%    20%    30%    20%    25%    34%
Disapprove           52     15     81     54     49     55     54     38
DK/NA                23     26     15     26     21     25     20     27
AGE IN YRS..............    WHITE.....
18-34  35-49  50-64  65+    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    Hsp
Approve              26%    25%    23%    24%    36%    25%    30%     7%    13%
Disapprove           52     56     54     49     42     49     46     78     57
DK/NA                22     19     23     27     22     26     24     14     30
30-    50-    100-                        Upper
<30K   50K    100K   250K   >250K  Wrkng  Middle Middle+
Approve              20%    23%    28%    24%    22%    24%    28%    21%
Disapprove           53     46     52     59     69     46     52     60
DK/NA                26     30     20     17      9     30     20     19

31. Do you think the Republican tax plan will increase your taxes, reduce your taxes, or will it not have much impact either way?

Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Yes    No
Increase taxes       35%    16%    54%    33%    31%    40%    33%    27%
Reduce taxes         16     33      8     13     20     13     17     20
Not much impact      36     43     27     41     39     33     41     39
DK/NA                12      9     11     13     10     14      9     14
AGE IN YRS..............    WHITE.....
18-34  35-49  50-64  65+    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    Hsp
Increase taxes       36%    35%    39%    31%    26%    33%    30%    56%    48%
Reduce taxes         13     17     18     14     23     15     19      5     14
Not much impact      37     40     31     41     42     38     40     30     21
DK/NA                14      7     12     14     10     14     12     10     18
30-    50-    100-                        Upper
<30K   50K    100K   250K   >250K  Wrkng  Middle Middle+
Increase taxes       32%    33%    36%    41%    45%    33%    37%    36%
Reduce taxes          8     16     19     14     24     16     16     17
Not much impact      44     37     34     37     28     37     36     37
DK/NA                16     15     10      8      3     14     11      9

32. Do you believe that the Republican tax plan will lead to an increase in jobs and economic growth, or not?

Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Yes    No
Yes/Believe          36%    78%     8%    31%    43%    30%    38%    47%
No                   52     12     80     56     47     57     54     39
DK/NA                12     10     11     13     11     14      8     13
AGE IN YRS..............    WHITE.....
18-34  35-49  50-64  65+    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    Hsp
Yes/Believe          30%    36%    36%    38%    50%    37%    43%     9%    20%
No                   53     57     51     50     41     51     46     79     57
DK/NA                17      7     13     12      9     12     11     13     22
30-    50-    100-                        Upper
<30K   50K    100K   250K   >250K  Wrkng  Middle Middle+
Yes/Believe          29%    35%    41%    32%    33%    39%    36%    32%
No                   53     48     50     60     62     45     53     59
DK/NA                18     16      9      8      5     16     10      9

33. Who do you think will benefit the most from this plan: low income Americans, middle class Americans, or wealthy Americans?

Tot    Rep    Dem    Ind    Men    Wom    Yes    No
Low income            6%    11%     3%     4%     7%     5%     5%     8%
Middle class         24     53      4     22     28     21     25     34
Wealthy              61     22     88     65     58     63     62     48
DK/NA                 9     13      4      9      8     11      8     10
AGE IN YRS..............    WHITE.....
18-34  35-49  50-64  65+    Men    Wom    Wht    Blk    Hsp
Low income            5%     7%     7%     4%     8%     5%     6%     -      7%
Middle class         23     24     23     25     34     27     30      4     10
Wealthy              62     66     60     59     50     58     54     88     73
DK/NA                 9      3     10     11      8     10      9      8     10
30-    50-    100-                        Upper
<30K   50K    100K   250K   >250K  Wrkng  Middle Middle+
Low income            8%     4%     5%     6%     8%     7%     5%     4%
Middle class         16     27     28     22     19     26     25     22
Wealthy              66     56     60     66     70     57     61     65
DK/NA                 9     13      7      6      3     10      9      8
The poll also has extensive questions about gun control and the broad support it has....
Share on Facebook

Looser state concealed carry laws equal more gun deaths…

Not surprising at all….

States that have more relaxed criteria for allowing residents to carry concealed handguns have a higher rate of gun deaths than states with stricter requirements, according to a study released Thursday.

Researchers at the Boston University School of Public Health found that states that have so-called “may issue” laws — which give law enforcement officials wide discretion to decide who can receive a concealed carry permit — have lower gun death rates than states that call for little discretion once basic criteria for obtaining the permit is met, also known as “shall issue” laws.

The study found that states with “shall issue” laws had handgun homicide rates that were 10.6 percent higher than “may issue” states. Additionally, “shall issue” states had firearm homicide rates that were 8.6 percent higher and overall homicide rates that were 6.5 percent higher than “may issue” states.

On opposite ends of the spectrum, Louisiana, a shall-issue state, had a firearm homicide rate of 9.96 per 100,000 residents in 2015; Hawaii, a may-issue state, had a firearm homicide rate of 0.75 per 100,000 residents in 2015….


Share on Facebook

NRA against outright ban of ‘bump-stock’ auto firing device for assault rifles…

What a SURPRISE!….


Anybody who even thought the National Rifle Assoc. was gonna back any legislation against anything doing with gun ownership was sadly mistaken….

The powerful U.S. gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, said on Sunday it would oppose an outright ban on bump-stock devices that the killer in the Las Vegas massacre of 58 people used to turn rifles into automatic weapons and strafe a crowd with bursts of sustained gunfire.

The NRA, which has seldom embraced new firearms-control measures, stunned gun control advocates last week when it issued a statement voicing willingness to support a restriction on bump stocks.

On Sunday, the organization said it was open to regulation but opposed any legislation banning the devices.

“We don’t believe that bans have ever worked on anything. What we have said has been very clear – that if something transfers a semiautomatic to function like a fully automatic, then it ought to be regulated differently,” Chris Cox, the NRA’s chief lobbyist, said on “Fox News Sunday.”…..


Share on Facebook

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) to intro a sweeping Federal background Check Bill…Update…Gun Stocks Rise…

In light of the  mass violence in Las Vegas Sen Murphy is getting ready to sponser a bill in Congress requiring increased background checks ….

The Bill will go nowhere just as other efforts after similar mass shootings….

Murphy acknowledged that it’s not yet clear if stronger background checks would have prevented Sunday’s shooting, but argued that it could have saved dozens of others who are shot, on average, each day in the United States.

“The fact is 80 other people died from guns yesterday and stronger background checks laws would have saved many of them,” he said.

Murphy noted he was still working out the timing of when he would introduce the legislation.

A group of Democratic senators, including Murphy, introduced legislation in 2016 that would have required a background check for nearly every sale or transfer of a gun.

But senators rejected both that measure, and a GOP alternative, last year, just days after the shootings at the Pulse.

Given those votes, any background check or gun control bill faces an uphill and unlikely path forward in a GOP-controlled Congress. ….



Murphy is looking for a background check law…

He is CAREFULLY NOT looking to ban certain types of weapons …


Gun stocks rose Monday following the deadliest mass shooting in American history late Sunday night. A gunman in a hotel room at the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas killed at least 58 people attending an outdoor concert and wounded over 500 more.

Shares of Sturm Ruger (RGR) were up 4%, while American Outdoor Brands (AOBC), the company formerly known as Smith & Wesson, gained more than 3%. A company named Olin(OLN), which owns the Winchester brand of ammunition, rose 6% to an all-time high.

The stocks have tended to rally in the immediate aftermath of mass killings, which sadly have become more routine…..


Share on Facebook

Republican House members move relax gun control rules…

They are looking to make easlier for people to purchase gun suppressors….(WTF would you need these for?)

The second effort is aimed at allowing person with concealed permits to transport their weapons across state lines….

(Some states would still not allow possesion of those weapons without their states license)….

The efforts could very well make it thru the House, but fail in the Senate….Maybe?

The last few years tragities haven’t stop some American’s efforts to keep their guns  and have more freedom to do whatever they want with them….

Some ‘American’s LOVE their Guns’……

They Do….

House GOP leaders are moving forward with plans to vote on two gun-related measures in the coming weeks, the first time Congress has taken up the controversial issue since Donald Trump became president.

A bill easing regulations on the purchases of gun silencers — also known as suppressors — could reach the House floor as early as next week.

Another measure allowing concealed carry permit holders to take their weapons to other states is also expected to move through the House Judiciary Committee and onto the floor this fall, possibly in October, according to GOP lawmakers and aides.

Both proposals are almost certain to pass the House, despite intense opposition from gun-control groups. In the Senate, Democrats will likely block the measures. Trump would almost certainly sign such bills if they ever got to his desk.

Nearly five years after the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, left 20 children dead and spurred an impassioned debate over expanding background checks for gun sales, the GOP-controlled Congress and the Trump administration are clearly moving in the opposite direction. Republican congressional leaders and Trump administration officials — at the urging of the National Rifle Association and other gun-rights groups — are looking to roll back restrictions on guns imposed during the Obama era….


Share on Facebook

The only legislation crafted in response to Columbine never went anywhere.

America is incapable of Controling gun’s even after mass shooting’s…..

The 1994 assault weapons ban became only the third piece of gun control legislation approved since 1968, but massive resistance left the law riddled with so many exemptions it was basically useless. The director of federal affairs at the National Rifle Association, the country’s top lobbying group for gun owners, portrayed the bill as an effort to “disarm” the American public, arguing in congressional testimony that advocates of the ban were “merely interested in eliminating any type of firearm whenever presented with an emotionally charged opportunity to do so.”

In an effort to appease the gun lobby and assure passage of the bill, Feinstein whittled down the list of firearms to be banned from 670 to 19. The TEC-9s used in the 1993 San Francisco shooting made the list, but the law exempted any weapon manufactured before the ban took effect from any restrictions.

The company that made TEC-9s, Navegar, ramped up production as the bill moved through Congress, and in the first eight months of 1994, it produced three times as many guns as it had in 1992. The company was allowed to sell every single one of those, and anyone who had purchased one could legally resell it to whomever they wanted.

That’s how Feinstein’s seemingly momentous assault weapons ban set the script for every other ineffectual attempt to implement gun laws in the United States. It unfolds the same way each time: A horrifying shooting happens and lawmakers pledge to prevent the next one. But often nothing comes out of Congress. On the rare occasions legislators do act, resistance from the gun lobby leaves the new law downright impotent. The massacre is soon relegated to a place on a list we recite after the next mass shooting, which starts the process anew. For more than two decades, it’s been America’s consistent cycle….


Share on Facebook

Trump does it again…Second Amendment People Could Stop Clinton?

WTF does THAT mean?

Some people take it to mean that Donald Trump is saying that the ‘gun people’ could actually go AFTER Hillary Clinton with their guns?

There are calls for the Secret Service to step into this…

THAT isn’t going to go anyplace…

(Trump’s campaign has issued a clarification and defense of Trump’s intention in his comments…)

Trump CAN and DOES say things that would get other people locked up…

The bottom line here?

Donald Trump has put his ‘foot in his mouth’ again…

Make no mistake…

His supporters (and some die hard Sanders people) will have NO PROBLEM with this comment…

But this isn’t the primaries…

The media reaction to this has be swift and negative…

And Hillary Clinton’s numbers continue to climb daily in the polls…

It’s almost like Donald Trump WANTS to throw the election in November…

Oh, Anyone who thought Donald Trump would be able to ‘cool it’?

Forget it….

Trump is gonna be Trump….

Donald Trump on Tuesday said “the Second Amendment people” may be the only way to stop Hillary Clinton from getting to appoint federal judges if she wins the presidential election in November.

“Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment,” he said as an aside while smiling. “By the way, and if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know. But I’ll tell you what, that will be a horrible day.”

The reference to the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, could be interpreted as a joke about using violence to stop Clinton or her judicial picks.

Trump was speaking at a rally in Wilmington, North Carolina, where he repeated his regular claim that Clinton intends to “abolish” the Second Amendment, presumably by appointing liberal justices to the Supreme Court. But Trump punctuated that line with an aside, suggesting that Second Amendment supporters might be in a position to stop her even if she’s elected.

The Trump campaign rejected the notion that Trump was inciting violence against Clinton or anyone else with his aside at the Wilmington rally. Instead, the campaign said the Manhattan billionaire was simply appealing to the collective political muscle Second Amendment supporters possess.

“It’s called the power of unification – 2nd Amendment people have amazing spirit and are tremendously unified, which gives them great political power,” Trump’s senior communications adviser Jason Miller said in a statement emailed to POLITICO. “And this year, they will be voting in record numbers, and it won’t be for Hillary Clinton, it will be for Donald Trump.”


Share on Facebook

Republican’s attack Obama for mentioning Gun Control and Dallas police shootings…

Anyone surprised at THIS?

Republicans laced into President Barack Obama’s comments in the wake of the Dallas shootings of 12 police officers and two bystanders that killed five in which he made reference to “powerful weapons” as an aggravating factor to the situation.

Speaking to reporters earlier in Warsaw, Poland, the president called the shooting a “wrenching reminder of the sacrifices” law enforcement makes for the American people, but also remarked “that when people are armed with powerful weapons, unfortunately it makes it more deadly and more tragic, and in the days ahead we are going to have to consider those realities as well.”

Ben Carson lit into Obama within the first hour of his remarks.

“Now is definitely not the time to get political,” the former Republican presidential candidate and Donald Trump surrogate told “Fox & Friends” when asked about Obama’s comments. “Now is the time to use logic and ask ourselves, why do we have a Constitution? Why do we have a Second Amendment? They’re always saying you don’t need a high powered weapon to hunt deer. The Constitution is not about deer hunting. It’s about people being able to defend themselves from an overly aggressive government or an external invasion.”


Share on Facebook

Democrats keep the pressure up in the House…Update….

In the era of Donald Trump and showmanship with social media…..
The Dempcrats use the stage to confront Republicans on doing SOMETHING against gun violence …
This sit-In is unprecedented in the US House….
While the Republicans have tried to cut the pictures from the chamber…Democrats HAVE found a way get the images out….They have found a way to use social media to bring their story out…And directly confront the Republicans and the National Rifle Association
This IS bare knuckle politics….
Democrats ARE taking this back to the 1960’s Civil Rights protests….
Donald Trump has started this…..
Democrats are taking it 100 steps forward…..
 By Hunter   @ Dailky Kos

 House Democrats and their Senate allies are continuing their sit-in to demand action be taken on America’s gun violence epidemic. There’s word that Republicans will attempt to take back the floor tonight to vote on a veto override of the administration’s new fiduciary rules, but Democrats are vowing to keep the floor afterwards.

If Paul Ryan does order the House gaveled back into session, good news: That will mean the C-SPAN cameras will get switched back on, giving America a better view of the sit-in. Right now members are relying (quite effectively) on Periscope videos by individual participating members. That footage, in turn, is being used by C-SPAN to report on events from the floor.

Some highlights from the last hour: Sen. Elizabeth Warren brought Dunkin’ Donuts. Jim Clyburn, Elijah Cummings and others have given rousing speeches calling for action; later tonight members plan to read aloud from Martin Luther King Jr’s Letters from a Birmingham Jail.

Stay tuned to see what happens. There’s been no attempt to end the sit-in so far—but if there is one, it’ll be broadcast on C-SPAN. Won’t that be nice.

Wednesday, Jun 22, 2016 · 9:39:59 PM EDT · Kerry Eleveld

GOP leadership reportedly aiming for a 10PM ET vote:



The American Civil Liberties Union has been against the use of the No-Fly list also….


The Protest is over ….Dem’s said for Now?…..The House will reconvene  July 5…Dem’s are unsure what will happen then…

Democrats are still searching on how to deal with the politics of this…

Republicans are using the rules of the House as the majority party….But the Senate Republicans HAD a vote….Ryan went hard against a vote….

Share on Facebook

Democratic Senate Guns filibuster ends on a ‘understanding’…

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Ct) spent more tha 15 hours proventing the US Senate from doing any business yesterday….

He did so in a effort to move the Republican majority to consister two amendments about the purchasing of guns….

One on strengthening background checks and a second on blocking suspected terrorists from buying a guns or explosive’s…

The Republican leadership has indicated that they will consider Murphy’s request which is actually just for vote by the Senate….

The Republicans do have a majority in the legislative body…..

Chances of either actions passing in the Republican majority House are remote at best….

But this action will serve some Senator’s well in the November elections….

The Connecticut Democrat took to the Senate floor around 11:20 a.m., pledging to “stand on this floor and talk … for, frankly, as long as I can.”

Though Murphy said he wanted a deal on strengthening background checks and blocking suspected terrorists from buying a guns or explosive — and suggested one was possible — it’s unclear if the move pushed the Senate closer to passing a bipartisan compromise.

Instead, Murphy indicated that there is an “understanding” to allow for votes on two Democratic proposals, but acknowledged “there’s no guarantee that those amendments pass.”

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said he is still trying to work with Democrats to see if the two parties could find an agreement on suspected terrorists buying guns but said he’s skeptical of Democrats’ intentions.

“We’re trying to find out … whether this is an effort to find a solution and common ground or whether this is just an effort to try to embarrass people,” the Senate’s No. 2 Republican told The Hill Wednesday evening. “I haven’t yet concluded which one it is.”

Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) shot down talk of an agreement Wednesday night, calling talk of “so-called negotiations… little more than a smokescreen.”
“We are still waiting for Republicans to find the courage to stand up to the National Rifle Association and join with Democrats to keep guns out of the hands of terror suspects,” he said.

Murphy’s effort won the support of dozens of Democratic senators, including Sens. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), as well as Hillary Clinton, the party’s presumptive nominee, and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)….


Share on Facebook

Conn. US Senate Democrat Murphy mounts a gun control filibuster

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) has launched a talking filibuster on the Senate floor in an effort to force Republicans and Democrats to come to an agreement on legislation to deny suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms and requiring universal background checks.

The Senate is debating a spending bill that Democrats hope to offer gun amendments to, but Murphy said that the Senate should “not proceed with debate on amendments to this bill until we have figured out a way to come together on, at the very least, two simple ideas.”

The Democrats’ floor fight came as some potential signs of compromise arose on gun measures in the Senate. A spokeswoman for Everytown for Gun Safety, the pro-gun control group led by former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, confirmed Wednesday morning that they were working with Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) on measures to ensure suspected terrorists could not purchase weapons….



The last Assault Weapons law had so many holes it you could drive a Truck thru it…..I woukldn’t expect anything different this time…

Share on Facebook

Political Roundup for June 15th, 2016…RRH Elections


Emails: Rumor has it that Russia is about to release the text of the emails Clinton had on her server while SoS. On one hand such a brazen attempt to influence an American election could engender sympathy for Clinton, but on the other hand hiding this information from the public was kind of the whole point of keeping a separate server in the first place. Putin releasing damming evidence of Clinton’s misconduct might be the exact boost the pro-Putin Trump needs in this election. We’ll have to see, though my bet is on it being comparatively mild, mostly because if it was juicy I think Putin would be blackmailing Clinton instead of just leaking it.

Gun Control: Since there was a mass shooting over the weekend, the Democrats have naturally restarted their game of “we must use this to pass more gun control”. This particular example involves the Democrats interrupting the congressional moment of silence, or just boycotting it in general in protest of the GOP’s refusal to pass unrelated bills that wouldn’t have actually solved the problem. Still, there have been stupider reactions to the Orlando shooting.

Presidential Polls: Clinton has had a relatively good week in polling, pulling away from Trump to a mid-to-high single digit lead in a number of polls (and higher in others). Whether this is just a post-primary bounce or a lasting movement is yet to be seen, but it’s worth remembering that its far from unusual for a Democrat to be leading a Republican at this point in the election….


Share on Facebook

The AR-15 Rifle story is complicated…It was kinda Illegal…It isn’t now…

There REALLY isn’t a concrete reason to have the weapon in any area that has a LOT of people around….

The riflfe is similar to the one solider’s use in war zones…

Effirts to completely ban the weapon, or those simimlar to it have NOT been successful….

There are ALWAYS ways law makers can and do make the purchase of thes type of weapons legal….

Even after this latest incident?

THAT is NOT gonna change….

American’s LOVE their guns and will NOt give them up , No matter how many people are hurt by people using them…

In this latest incident in Orlando?

The rifle was LEGALLY bought….

Efforts by Democratic lawmakers to stop people from owning guns in th past have resulted in some losing their jobs….

The current anti-gun reaction always occurs after a mass shooting, even with kids….

And it always disappaears a short whiloe later…..Gun Control is NOT a winner for Democrats no matter how much it should be….

Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, used an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle and a 9 mm semi-automatic pistol to kill 49 people at the Pulse nightclub Sunday. The same style of rifle was also used by the shooters at San Bernardino, California; Umpqua Community College in Oregon; Sandy Hook and several other mass shootings in recent years. On Monday, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton described the rifle as a “weapon of war” that should be banned, and President Obama concurred. But an effective ban could be difficult to devise.

The AR-15 used to be illegal. President Bill Clinton’s assault weapons ban, which was in effect from 1994 to 2004, banned the AR-15 and other guns that were too similar to military-style weapons. However, this law did not prohibit Americans from owning semi-automatic weapons;1 it capped how many military features an individual gun could have. During the ban, a semi-automatic rifle like the AR-15 could legally have any one of the following features, as long as it didn’t have two or more of them: a folding stock (making the gun slightly easier to conceal), a pistol grip (making the weapon easier to hold and use), a bayonet mount, a flash suppressor (making it harder to see where shots are coming from), or a grenade launcher.

A 2004 report commissioned by the Department of Justice on the effects of the assault weapons ban concluded that the law was largely ineffective at limiting access to weapons with the power of the AR-15. According to the report, the ban focused on “features that have little to do with the weapons’ operation, and removing those features is sufficient to make the weapons legal.” The report noted that several semi-automatic rifles were functionally equivalent to the AR-15 and untouched by the ban….



Share on Facebook

Attack in Orlando leaves 50 dead…53 wounded…

In a action that lasted for 3 hours….

A Muslin man born in New York walked into a popular gay club in Orlando Florida and ended up killing 50 of the people inside and wounding another 53 before police ended the standoff….

(Officals are cautioning that some injuries could have been the result of law eneforcement actions)

The subject had been investigated by the FBI 3 years ago after speaking about terrorist ties, but was not deemed a threat…He worked in Florida as a security guard , which enabled him to purchase guns legally….The subject had open talked about his hatre of jews, blacks , women and gays….The subject had been in a abusive marruage which resulted in a divorce ….

It was the worst act of terrorism on American soil since Sept. 11, 2001, and the deadliest attack on a gay target in the nation’s history, though officials said it was not clear whether some victims had been accidentally shot by law enforcement officers.

Gov. Rick Scott of Florida said on Monday that he had asked President Obama to issue a federal emergency declaration for his state.

“Yesterday’s terror attack was an attack on our state and entire nation,” Mr. Scott said in a statement. “This morning, I have asked President Obama to declare an emergency so that the full resources of the federal government can be made available for all those impacted by this horrific massacre.”

In a letter to Mr. Obama, Mr. Scott sought two forms of federal aid: “provision of health and safety measures,” as well as “management, control and reduction of immediate threats to public health and safety.” An emergency declaration by Mr. Obama would give Florida up to $5 million in initial federal funding…..



The incident has reopened the terror and gun issues….Law Enforecenmet has NOT found any direct connection to terror groups now or before …so far…There is a clear anti-gay part to the incident though…

The politican’s have also weighed in the incident in terms of terrorism….

It sure looks like this was HATE CRIME more than ANYTHING else….

Share on Facebook

Romney and Paul Ryan STILL don’t beat Hillary Clinton….Poll…

In the newest Public Policy Polling national poll…..

Hillary Clinton/Sanders tops out Romney/Ryan, both who have been mentioned as GOP ‘go to guys’ in place of Donald Trump or Ted Cruz….

PPP’s newest national poll finds that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan wouldn’t exactly be the solution to the GOP’s Donald Trump problem, with Romney doing even worse head to head against Hillary Clinton than Trump does.

Clinton (48/41) and Bernie Sanders (48/40) each lead Trump by solid margins, and have more modest leads over Ted Cruz as well (45/42 for Clinton, 48/41 for Sanders). Clinton (45/41) and Sanders (44/41) would each trail John Kasich. We find that a generic Democrat would lead a generic Republican for President 45/43 so when it comes to match ups against Clinton, Cruz essentially is the generic Republican with Trump being 5 points worse and Kasich being 6 points better. Much is made of Trump’s unpopularity nationally and he certainly is unpopular- a 29/63 favorability rating- but Cruz isn’t much better off at 30/58. Kasich’s 41/39 rating makes him the only candidate in either party on positive ground.

There’s been a lot of talk about Republicans possibly nominating Romney or Ryan at a contested convention, but both under perform a generic Republican candidate. Romney is incredibly unpopular nationally now- his 23/65 favorability rating is even worse than the 29/63 Trump comes in at. Clinton (45/32) and Sanders (48/31) each lead Romney by double digit margins. Ryan would trail Clinton 44/39 and Sanders 45/38, numbers not terribly dissimilar to how Trump polls against each of them. It’s not clear Romney or Ryan would do much to save the party this year.

There’s been talk about Rick Perry as a potential independent candidate for President to give the #NeverTrump people somewhere to go if he wins the nomination. Perry gets 12% as an independent….


Share on Facebook

America’s long, sad history of school shootings

All the talk about Gun Control and Background checks HAS NOT changed this and won’t….

Our Gun Culture in this country bleeds into this… 

School shoots and mass shootings  are just more reported in this informational age…..(Up to 160 in the last few years)

NO ONE cares the next day except those who personally suffer from them….(They occur outside the US alos , but nowhere near the numbers here)


This IS America ‘s history…..

By Sher Watts Spooner   @ Daily Kos…..

Emergency personnel assist survivors of the nation’s first mass shooting of schoolchildren. 

When we think of school killings, we usually think of recent events, like the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, that killed 20 children (mostly first- and second-graders) and six adults. Or the 1999 shootings in Littleton, Colorado, where students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold terrorized their classmates and teachers at Columbine High School, killing 13 and wounding 20. The many killings on or near college campuses, from the shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007 that killed 32 and wounded 17, to the attack near the University of California at Santa Barbara in 2014 that killed six and injured 14, to the shootings at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon, in 2015 that killed nine and hurt nine more. The list goes on and on.

The sad fact is that the United States, awash with guns throughout its existence, has a troubled history of school killings—by far more than any other country. The motivations behind modern shootings can be murky, and the lack of action on how to stop them remains frustrating.

The vast majority of shooters (although not all) were white and male. Most acted alone, and by the second half of the 20th century, these shooters carried at least two weapons. About half of the shooters were students. Many incidents early in the country’s history involved one or two victims, often settling a personal grievance. Modern shootings, especially after weaponry grew more sophisticated, were more likely to claim multiple lives, although the mass shootings described as “rampage” shootings still remain rare…..


Share on Facebook