No surprise here….
He’s a Democrat…
No surprise here….
He’s a Democrat…
The blowback at ex-Democratic national Committee chair Donna Brazile was immediate and STRONG…..
While Sanders people might be trying to complain about the way things went last year?
Democrats on a whole KNEW and where ok with Hillary Clinton, not so good run….She bailed out a broke party and went on to lose the election after beating Donald Trump by almost THREE MILLON votes….
And just when Democrats are trying to move forward?
Recrimantions about last year to make Bernie sanders peoiple happy has NOT gone over well with the people who are ACTUALLY Democrats…
Warren has gotten the message to cool it…
And is doing so…
So is coming out of her shell with the press and learning that it isn’t sdo easy being out there…Hillary Clinton would agree with her…
The change in her view of the Democratic primary came six days after she shocked Democrats by unexpectedly wading into the party’s civil war and validating former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Donna Brazile’s allegations that Hillary Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters controlled party operations before Clinton was the nominee.
Warren told the Springfield Republican on Wednesday there was “some bias” within the DNC when the ultimate nominee, Clinton, and Bernie Sanders were battling for the party’s nomination. But she also said “the overall 2016 primary process was fair and Hillary made history.”
It’s a marked change from her comments last week when Warren said in three national TV interviews that the process was rigged. She was most explicit in a back-and-forth with PBS’s Judy Woodruff in which she said: “We recognize the process was rigged, and now it is up to Democrats to build a new process, a process that really works, and works for everyone.”
On Thursday, a spokesman for Warren, Lacey Rose, said, “Senator Warren believes there was bias at the DNC but when asked in an interview on Wednesday she clarified her belief that the broader primary process was fair.”…
image from last year…chicagotribune.com
That is bad news for Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren….
Last year in the primaries Hillary Clinton kept the black vote to win the nomination from media darling Bernie Sanders….
Warren has never made much of inroads with blacks who probably don’t much know who she is….
Most black voters aren’t into hard left Democrats ….
Black voters are looking for a President that plays to THEIR basic needs….
Bill Clinton and Barack Obama owned their vote for two terms each…
Hillary Clinton had the black vote last November….But new analysis has shown that Hillary did NOT get that extra vote from blacks that went to her husband and Obama…
With Sanders and Warren NOT the idea politicians to get that extra black vote above the black vote that always goes Democratic?
Democrats should be searching for someone who CAN light the black, hispanic, main, and yes the left parts of the Democratic party if they want to mount a SERIOUS effort to get the Presidency back in 2020…..
Black voters have historically rallied behind one Democratic candidate. In 2008, Barack Obama’s ability to break Clinton’s lock on African-American voters was the main reason he upset the front-runner to become the Democratic nominee. Bill Clinton’s and Jimmy Carter’s personal history wooing Southern black voters were key factors in their out-of-nowhere nominations in 1992 and 1976. Back in the 1980s, Democratic candidates curtailed campaigning in black communities because Jesse Jackson’s campaign was so popular with African-Americans. Since 1976, the candidate backed by black voters became the Democratic nominee in seven of the nine contested nomination battles. (John Kerry comfortably won the backing of black voters in 2004, though he narrowly lost their support to John Edwards in South Carolina—when the nomination fight was still competitive.)
The lesson of recent political history is that the Democrats who are the darlings of white progressives—the so-called “wine track” candidates—usually fall short. In 2004, Howard Dean was unable to broaden his coalition beyond young voters and the most liberal elements of the party. He only won 108 delegates. Bill Bradley filled the progressive void against Al Gore in 2000, and didn’t win a single primary. Obama shattered that mold in 2008, but only by forging a rare alliance between “beer track” African-American voters and the more progressive elite wing of the party.
But the prospective 2020 field for Democrats is overwhelmingly white and unabashedly progressive. Democrats have all but ceded the South, with only three Democratic governors left in the region. And the party’s increasing progressivism doesn’t necessarily resonate with African-American voters, particularly the older generation who found little to like in Bernie Sanders’ insurgent candidacy.
Looking at 2020 polling is foolhardy, given how much could change before the campaign heats up, but it is interesting to see the early disparity between white and black Democratic voters in assessing leading progressive candidates. A Public Policy Polling survey conducted last December showed that the two progressive icons—Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders —polled at 48 percent among white Democrats, but just 27 percent among African-Americans. Cory Booker, the only African-American candidate tested, got the backing of 10 percent of black voters and 4 percent of white Democrats.
Choosing a nominee who will excite African-American voters will be critical for the Democrats in the general election. With Obama off the ballot in 2016, African-American turnout declined markedly, even with the high stakes of last year’s presidential election. It’s a key reason why Clinton lost narrowly in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. There’s no sign that African-American engagement will rebound in a post-Obama era, even as the Democratic base is agitating to be part of the anti-Trump resistance.
It’s hard to see some of the most-buzzworthy Democrats such as Sanders, Warren, and Al Franken fitting that bill. All hail from homogeneous states with small African-American populations….
I have been pushing Cory Booker as the lead in 2020 Democratic Presidential sweepstakes running….
If Bookers numbers among black and white Democrats does NOT improve?
He won’t be the answer….
Kamal Harrtis is being talked up….Although a lot of people do not know who she is….
It’s way tooooo early…..
But my money is on NJ US Senator Cory Booker actually being the front runner RIGHT NOW of Democratic Presidential sweepstakes players……..
Donald Trump is only in his second month in the White House, but already one Democrat is polling his party’s Iowa caucus-goers ahead of a possible 2020 run for the presidency.
The leadership PAC of former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley commissioned a Public Policy Polling survey of the first-in-the-nation caucus state earlier this month, according to a copy of the results obtained by POLITICO.
The poll, which shows O’Malley at 18 percent of Democratic caucus-goers in a field of nine potential candidates if the contest were held today, also asked the Iowans about New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker; former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julián Castro; New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo; Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Kamala Harris of California and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota; Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg; and Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. “Not sure” got 32 percent of the vote.
O’Malley — who ran against Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders for the 2016 nomination before dropping out on caucus night after earning less than 1 percent of the vote — was joined at the top of the poll by Booker, who was at 17 percent. Klobuchar, who represents a neighboring state and who’s been a frequent visitor to Iowa over the years, got 11 percent. All other candidates were under 10 percent.
A number of high-profile potential 2020 candidates were left out of the poll, including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Sanders…..
image….the daily beast
Hillary Clinton BEAT Donald Trump by almost 3 Million votes….
Barack Obama is up to a 60% approval rate…..
Obamacare support is approaching 50%…..
And Donald Trump is the President of the United States….
Republicans continue to win BIG in state and local elections since 2010….
What gives is Democrats are all right in the collective American population….
But are losing their shirts, pants and political underwear in elections….
Americans on the Right are scared of the changes that are occurring in this country as it advances thru the 21st century….
Most other Americans are just going thru their lives and do NOT want to mount the fight the mostly right leaners are waging….
The question for the Democrats is?
Can Donald Trump actually be the catalyst to help Democrats comeback on the nations political battle field?
….Every path back to power runs through figuring out how to get voters to believe again that the Democratic Party, founded on and forever about a fairer economy, is aware that millions of Americans feel the economy’s been unfair to them and think Democrats have no real plans to do anything about it.
“Trump is talking about the economy of the past, bringing us backward to an economy that doesn’t exist anymore. Rather than going back into the coal mines, we’ve got to show how hardworking people in Appalachia can contribute to the new economy,” says Moulton, who is often talked about as a candidate for statewide office and beyond. “The message has to be: ‘We need you, we want you to be a part of the economy.’ We’re not going to pretend that it’s going to be 1955 again, but there’s a new economy coming and America’s not going to succeed if it’s not responding.”
This has echoes of how Bill Clinton campaigned in 1992—as a champion of globalization who would make it work better for ordinary Americans—but that was before so many of the factories had closed, before the culture felt different, before the internet made everything more immediate and more immediately infuriating. Yet Obama and his 21st-century Democrats beat back the Clinton restoration in 2008 in large part by running against the incremental, crabwise approach of the ’90s. Bill Clinton was a Southern Democrat who grew up in a world of political constraints, and there aren’t too many of those anymore; what the base wants now is Warren-like progressive passion, without any of the liberal self-loathing they sensed in the Clintons.
Over emails, texts and phone calls, ad hoc networks of younger Democrats have started to form, eager to talk about a new start for the party.
“Part of the work I’m doing right now is recognizing there is nobody left. It’s pulling together my peers,” says Eric Garcetti, a 45-year old Mexican-American Jewish mayor of Los Angeles who is widely assumed to be part of the party’s future in California and potentially beyond. He wanted Clinton to win. But there’s a certain freedom in moving past Clintonism.
“It’s maybe the end of … ‘The era of big government is over,’” he says.
The Politics of Obstruction
It’s been 10 years since Democrats didn’t control at least one wing of the federal government, and a lot of them, argues Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat elected to the House in 2014, have forgotten what that’s like. Those who do, he says, are all basing their thinking on what they did to George W. Bush or what Mitch McConnell did to Obama. “They’re scared of the unknown. This is a new world for them. And they’re trying to find solace in what they know,” Gallego says….
Many Democrats want Obama now to be the field marshal on the campaign trail and the architect of the revival, if only out of penance for the eight years of Democratic decimation on his watch—a record that culminated in his sharing a limo from the White House to the Inauguration with a man once thought to be the most unelectable major-party nominee in generations.
Yea It’s early…..
And unless a mircle happens with the recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania ?
The White House will be occupied by one Donald Trump if he doesn’t quit or get kicked out…..
Who would the Democrats be looking to early to run for the Presidedncy in 2020?
Here’s some people floated by others….
Bernie Sanders. Just after Trump was elected, the self-described “democratic socialist” from Vermont was asked if he’d run in 2020. “We’ll take one thing at a time,” he responded. “But I’m not ruling out anything.” Sanders’ unlikely 2016 surge won him national recognition and popularity across party lines, especially with young voters. But Bernie will be 79 in 2020, older than any major party nominee in America’s history. This obviously presents concern; though at 70, Donald Trump is already older than any other President beginning his first term.
Elizabeth Warren. The progressive populist has so far denied interest in running, but she has a sizable following and a definite lane — which would open up significantly if Sanders chose to sit out. Many fear the Democrats would be unlikely to nominate another female candidate following the misogyny that led to Clinton’s defeat, though the Massachusetts Senator could be the best choice to override that.
Cory Booker. Here’s a reality TV star who’s actually highly qualified to run for President. Booker’s time as mayor of Newark, NJ was chronicled on the Sundance Channel series Brick City and — to make him even more viable as a 21st century candidate — he’s especially adept at social media. He hasn’t been vocal about a Presidential run, but that could be because of his current duties, serving in the U.S. Senate.
Sherrod Brown. Representing the swing state of Ohio, this Senator could likely make a study campaign run, albeit without the name recognition of those just mentioned. His name floated around as a possible Vice President choice for Hillary Clinton this summer.
Kirsten Gillibrand. The New York Senator filled Hillary Clinton’s seat when she was named to Barack Obama’s cabinet. Her name recognition is growing, often around her activism to raise awareness of sexual violence on campuses.
Julian Castro. The Obama Cabinet member comes with a compelling American dream narrative and serious comparisons to the man who appointed him. He was raised in a low-income San Antonio neighborhood by a single mother, only to become mayor of his hometown by his mid 30s, and later, like Obama before him, enjoyed a breakthrough moment by giving the keynote speech at the 2012 Democratic convention….
One of Clinton’s more vocal congressional supporters, the Minnesota senator’s name is a regular in future presidential speculation too.
Like President Obama, she’s a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School and has spearheaded work to curb sexual assault in the military along with Gillibrand and others. She’s very popular in her home state and has a background in law enforcement as a county prosecutor.
Along with Gillibrand and Warren, Klobuchar, 56, is part of the group of women who could attempt to succeed where Clinton fell short in breaking the presidency’s glass ceiling.
A less common pick, the former Saturday Night Live cast member could be an interesting foil to the reality show superstar turned President Elect.
Franken, 65, has sought to ditch the “funny man” reputation since he arrived in the Senate, but has started to open up a bit more recently as he stumped for Clinton and bashed Trump.
Some are buying into the early speculation, with the “Draft Al Franken 2020” super-PAC registered on Wednesday.
O’Malley served as the odd man out during the Democratic primary, taken far more seriously than Lincoln Chafee and Jim Webb but unable to get past the low single-digits in the polls.
But many Democrats saw O’Malley’s bid as a low-risk test drive for a future candidacy, as the 53-year-old former Maryland Governor staked out a number of progressive positions and sought to position himself with one foot in either camp of the party.
He’s now angling for a post atop the DNC, which could put him at the center of the effort to reshape the party.
The newly-minted incoming senator for California has drawn comparisons to the rise of another young, black Democrat—Barack Obama.
A presidential bid would be on an ambitious timeline for the 52-year-old Harris, who would be just a few years into her first term in the Senate as the body’s first Indian-American senator (her mother is Indian and her father is Jamaican). But she has drawn praise for her progressive tenure as the state’s Attorney General and had the field almost entirely cleared for her 2016 Senate bid….
Like Barack Obama, she will TRY to do things she has ALWAYS wanted to do….
But NO Democratic President can cater to the left/Progressive wing of their party…..
First of all the House will probably remain in Republican Paul Ryan’s hands….
With Trump gone?
The Rightwingnuts will be out for political blood as they have been since their numbers increased in 2010…..
It is true that in recent years the political middle has diminished in Congress….But the Right has gained a stronger foothold in the States and THAT has had an effective block on some of the efforts by President Obama….
Those same politic’s will come to President Clinton….
But she will be in a weaker place than Obama who had majorities in both houses of Congress in his first two years….
There are House and US Senate election coming in 2018…..
Democrats will have MORE seat to defend….
The way I see things is Hillary Clinton will have just a year to move on somethings before she will be handicapped by her party members in Congress worried about defending their seats….
I further see Paul Ryan as being the leader of the Republican party….
Despite all the noise about Donald trump after the election?
Ryan is gonna be the guy….
Trump doesn’t do policy……
Ryan will be the leader , having to deal with an ANOTHER Democratic President and Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer who was Senator Hillary Clinton’s mentor in the Senate….
Not with the political chess game she will have play keeping the US Senate after 2018 and not losing her 2016 gains in the House 2 years later….
Nothing I present here will stop Clinton from following up on Obama’s efforts for Immigration reform, Abortion rights and other things…..
But she is gonna have to walk a tightrope…..
After Obama won in 2008 Democrats where strutting around saying the Republican party was done for….
2 Years later the Democrats lost their majorities in the House and Senate….
Hillary Clinton will be well aware of that….
The more of the email leaks dumped out?
They more that show a campaign in the traditional sense moving thru issue and problems and solving them….
There has been NOTHING damaging to the Clinton campaign…
Indeed the leaks do Hillary Clinton a favor by showing her to NOT be devious ..But instead a cautious politican , who has a sense of what the reality of public and private politics is…It also has show a daughter keeping tabs on her father and Hillary Clinton warning bankers, the one who have given her campaign money, to get their act together….
These are NOT bad things ….
Jullian Assunge (And his Russian connection it seems) have played themselves from relevance in this….
Here’s how Clinton put it in that 2013 speech, and be prepared, I’m going to quote her at length: “Politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody’s watching … all of the backroom discussions and the deals … then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position. And finally, I think–I believe in evidence-based decisionmaking. I want to know what the facts are.” Clinton is speaking an essential, uncontroversial truth about how things work in a democracy. And yet, for much of the public–and too much of our media–her sentiments are perceived as shifty, further evidence that she can’t be trusted, as if a willingness to compromise were a sign of weakness, not a necessary strength.
As for the rest of the emails, there are the occasional screw-ups and embarrassing moments of candor, but–as with the WikiLeaks dump of the State Department’s diplomatic cables–the most striking thing about them is the careful, intelligent way in which the Clinton staff goes about the business of politics. There is substantive consternation about how to deal with Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren on Wall Street, a careful massaging of where to come down on Warren’s proposal for a new Glass-Steagall law to regulate banking. Clinton and her advisers believe that Sanders is being too simplistic…
Watching the deliberations unfold, I found myself thinking, Boy, Assange has done a public service. It’s good to know how policy develops in a political campaign.
Some on the left will find Clinton’s attempts to flatter and find common ground with her Wall Street audiences offensive–her willingness to take money for these speeches was a big mistake–but if you look at the content of the talks, Clinton is essentially warning the bankers about the public’s belief that they have behaved badly, while calling for more “transparency” and reform, a message her audiences may not have wanted to hear…..
Apparently, those three letters sum up how a good number of Americans, in particular younger voters, feel about the prospect of voting for Hillary Clinton. Tina Nguyen at Vanity Fair put it as follows: “the majority of millennials, nearly all of whom disagree with Trump’s positions, are not sufficiently excited by the Democratic alternative to do anything about it.”
Granted, it’s just one survey, but look at the numbers from Quinnipiac’s poll conducted September 8 to 13. Almost half of those under age 35 say they’re voting for Gary Johnson or Jill Stein. Other polling—along with Clinton’s performance among younger voters in 2008 as well as in the primary contest against Bernie Sanders—show similar problems for her.
I don’t want to focus too long on the numbers, but these kinds of figures tell me that younger Americans are probably the group with the highest percentage of persuadable voters. It’s not likely that many people saying they’d vote for Trump at this late date in the campaign are going to end up voting for Clinton. However, voters who think Trump is an unqualified bigot—and about two-thirds of those ages 18 to 39 said they did in a recent poll—should be voting for Hillary. Yet many are not. So, what are we going to do about it?
We who do support Secretary Clinton have a number of options. We can wallow in pessimism; we can get angry at those who, it seems to us, just won’t see reason; or we can try to persuade them. I think you know which is the most productive.
Separate from the fact that it is true, it is strategically important to talk about how dangerous Donald Trump is. Doing so will motivate some of our voters—and of course much of our energy should go to making sure our voters go to the polls. But others have already gotten that message about Trump—yet for them, it hasn’t translated into supporting Hillary. They need a reason to turn their vote for ‘not Trump’ into a vote for Hillary as opposed to a third-party candidate, or no one at all. I’m voting for Hillary, and not just because she’s not Trump. Here’s why….
Politico does a long piece on the above…..
The piece promotes the keep Joe Biden from running this time part, but goes into in detail about how Obama came to form a political relationship with Hillary Clinton and how he would pull out ALL the stops to help her get back into the White House, this time as President….
Although the two tan against each other in 2008…..
Barack Obama came to think early on in his Presidency that Hillary Clinton would be the best person succed him as President and help keep HIS policies in place….
For Clinton, it was at first a try to change her 2008 efforts mistakes and do things HER way….
But with Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders threatening her?
She has come much more to the left than she originally planned to…..
The piece IS a process pice and it does make Obama look cunning and the Svengali for the continuance of his wants and the contiuance of the Democrats in power….
Joe Biden was leery about a run off and on , but the piece points to his boss working for a long time to convince Biden to defer to a Clinton run….
Warren NEVER really was into running for the Presidency, but Bernie Sanders was and threw everyone a curve ball….
But as others have observed…After the Nevada Primary Sanders would be looked as a problem that would NOT stop Obama’s efforts to get Clinton the nomionationn and the White House…..
The piece points to the Obama White House starting early on to provide help and guidance to Clinton’s efforts…..
There where times when Obama would be NOT happy with Clinton’s actions against HIS policies …But Clinton was running….He wasn’t and she would do whatever she had to deal with HER issues…Not his….(TPP)….
One of the most important if hidden story lines of 2016 has been Obama’s effort to shape a race he’s not running in an anti-establishment environment he can no longer control. Over the past two years, he has worked quietly but inexorably on Clinton’s behalf, never mind the not-so-convincing line that he was waiting for the Democratic electorate to work its will. He has offered his former rival strategic advice, shared his top talent with her, bucked her up with cheery phone chats after her losses, even dispatched his top political adviser to calm the Clintons during their not-infrequent freakouts over the performance of their staff, according to one of the two dozen Democrats I interviewed for this story.
The affable traveling press secretary joined Clinton world as a lowly advance staffer on the 2008 campaign, gained Clinton’s trust at the State Department and was one of a few staffers who remained with her between Foggy Bottom and the 2016 campaign, serving as a one-man press team in her personal office. Image
The one thing he wouldn’t do was endorse her before she cleared the field. And once, when things were darkest after Clinton’s devastating defeat to Senator Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire, Clinton’s staff urged him to break his pledge and rescue her—but his team refused, a senior Democrat told me.
Clinton’s view of Obama is more conflicted, people close to both politicians told me. She has repeatedly said, “I’m not running for Obama’s third term,” while taking pains to emphasize their differences on issues such as free trade and Syria. And she started the campaign committed to earning the nomination without his overt help.
But Clinton has been pulled closer to the president out of mutual self-interest and circumstance as the long primary season has worn on: Both Sanders’ unexpected success and Obama’s 80 percent-plus approval ratings with registered Democrats have forced the former secretary of state into a tighter embrace than she anticipated. Indeed, her campaign’s internal polling showed that one of the most effective attack lines against the socialist from Vermont was his 2011 remark that Obama’s moderate governing record was “weak” and a “disappointment” to progressives.
“When he could sense the end, it was like, ‘Who gives me the best chance to win?’”
Clinton and Obama have something else in common: They both failed to anticipate seriously the rise of Trump. Early on, they were looking out for challenges from Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and Sanders on the left, and Florida Senator Marco Rubio as the most dangerous Republican in the field. But Trump’s ascent has only increased the urgency of the president’s last White House mission. “Mr. Trump will not be president,” Obama declared flatly back in February.
Obama’s ultimate goal in his final year has been strikingly ambitious, according to those I spoke with: not only blocking from office the birther who questioned his legitimacy as president, but preserving the Democratic Party’s hold over the presidency during an era of anti-establishment turbulence. Obama, always one to embrace a grand goal, talks in terms of creating “a 16-year era of progressive rule” to rival the achievements of Roosevelt-Truman and to reorient the country’s politics as a “Reagan of the left,” as one of his longtime White House advisers put it to me.
Wall Street money people ARE in Philly this week….
Progressives may not like it….
(Neither will Warren or Sanders…But they aren’t the nominee)
But they ARE there….
The former New York Senator still has friends from her home state and they are betting that the guys who forecast the November results are right and Hillary will be the winner for the Presidency….
Oh, and they probably don’t trust Donald Trump much since he has been known to beat other rich people out of their money…
Hordes of industry executives will descend on the city to celebrate Hillary Clinton’s nomination for president and renew close associations that vexed the Democratic standard-bearer throughout her primary battle with Bernie Sanders.
Goldman Sachs, which paid Clinton millions for private speeches, will be well represented in Philadelphia with executives Jake Siewert, a former Bill Clinton press secretary, making the trip along with Steven Barg, Michael Paese, Joyce Brayboy and Jennifer Scully, who was a major fundraiser for Bill Clinton in New York in 1992.
Blackstone, one of the nation’s largest private equity firms, will hold an official reception in Philadelphia on Thursday featuring its president, Tony James, sometimes mentioned as a possible Treasury secretary in a Clinton administration.
Hedge fund managers and top Democratic donors including Avenue Capital’s Marc Lasry and Boston Provident’s Orin Kramer will also be on the scene, as will Morgan Stanley executive and former top Clinton aide Tom Nides. Executives from Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and other large banks will also prowl the streets and barrooms of Philadelphia.
The financial contingent will be in an especially good mood following Clinton’s selection of Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine as her running mate. Kaine has shown a willingness to fight for regional bank relief from the Dodd-Frank financial reform law. But more than that, he’s not Elizabeth Warren, the potential VP pick that long had Wall Street terrified.
Republicans with ties to the financial industry will also be there, a sharp contrast to Donald Trump’s convention in Cleveland, which Wall Street largely shunned over fears of the GOP nominee’s populist agenda on trade, immigration and Wall Street reform.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Ct) spent more tha 15 hours proventing the US Senate from doing any business yesterday….
He did so in a effort to move the Republican majority to consister two amendments about the purchasing of guns….
One on strengthening background checks and a second on blocking suspected terrorists from buying a guns or explosive’s…
The Republican leadership has indicated that they will consider Murphy’s request which is actually just for vote by the Senate….
The Republicans do have a majority in the legislative body…..
Chances of either actions passing in the Republican majority House are remote at best….
But this action will serve some Senator’s well in the November elections….
The Connecticut Democrat took to the Senate floor around 11:20 a.m., pledging to “stand on this floor and talk … for, frankly, as long as I can.”
Though Murphy said he wanted a deal on strengthening background checks and blocking suspected terrorists from buying a guns or explosive — and suggested one was possible — it’s unclear if the move pushed the Senate closer to passing a bipartisan compromise.
Instead, Murphy indicated that there is an “understanding” to allow for votes on two Democratic proposals, but acknowledged “there’s no guarantee that those amendments pass.”
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said he is still trying to work with Democrats to see if the two parties could find an agreement on suspected terrorists buying guns but said he’s skeptical of Democrats’ intentions.
“We’re trying to find out … whether this is an effort to find a solution and common ground or whether this is just an effort to try to embarrass people,” the Senate’s No. 2 Republican told The Hill Wednesday evening. “I haven’t yet concluded which one it is.”
Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) shot down talk of an agreement Wednesday night, calling talk of “so-called negotiations… little more than a smokescreen.”
“We are still waiting for Republicans to find the courage to stand up to the National Rifle Association and join with Democrats to keep guns out of the hands of terror suspects,” he said.
Murphy’s effort won the support of dozens of Democratic senators, including Sens. Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), as well as Hillary Clinton, the party’s presumptive nominee, and her rival Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)….