Mitt Romney (52%)
Romney’s pick of Paul Ryan as VP has succeeded in moving WI into a tossup race, but Romney’s reviving of the tax issue could succeed in somewhat negating that.
Barack Obama (48%)
Talk of dumping Biden over his obsession with chains has the President in a worrisome spot, especially considering the fact that Hilary Clinton has declined interest in replacing Biden. Many Democrats are also worried that Obama’s plunging approvals may prove to be too much for them to handle. The Democratic Convention is shaping up to be one for the history books.
Share on Facebook
Daniel, I can understand why you would believe that Keith wants you banned, although I am pretty sure that is not true.
you are correct that you correctly predicted Tommy Thompson’s win, and both Keith and I got it wrong. Getting my prediction wrong was a good reminder of the need for humility.
I don’t know why Keith brought up your conversation with your parents, but there are also times that I bring up things you don’t understand, or you bring up things that I don’t fully understand.
We all see things differently. When I make a post on pdog101, I do so of my own choice. if James or someone else makes subsequently makes a statement that I find offensive, I don’t think that gives me the right to ask James to withdraw my comment. That is how I see it, but I respect that you and Corey see it differently.
I’m happy for you that your experience at Hillsong International Leadership College was very beneficial to you.
Based on Zreebs explanation of why Corey claimed he left the site
And didn’t wish to be associated with it
My comment is that is one of the DUMBEST damn things I ever heard
I have read comments by all sorts of posters COREY INCLUDED a hundred times worse than that
Hell that wasn’t even one of the Dogs worst!
Remember that guy named Kevin on Politics1who would bash Republicans with epithet after epithet
Corey would coolly reply to him
He wasn’t “offended”
Which then lend credence to my theory of why he left
And his”reason” was just an excuse
And although the question of banning wasn’t directed at me but at Keith and he can speak or himself
I believe he and I feel similarly that SEs silliness should not rate a feature article
But should be confined to the comments
And that in commenting on the article
Of necessity the commenter in the guise of the reviewer would comment on the motivations and logic of the author of the post
Think of a book review
Neither of us seeks to ban anyone
And The Dog says he “loves” comments
So why question us when we are simply offering that which he claims to “love”
Zreebs, thanks for the kind words, and, of course, I don’t want Daniel banned (as if I had any power to do that in first place). But, I will continue to point out his massive inconsistencies. Oh, and yes, Daniel Thompson won because he got more votes than the two wingers he was running against. And, while it will be tougher for Tammy to beat this geezer, my money is still on her. But, why while we’re at it — why won’t Tommy release his tax returns? I bet he did some really high priced lobbying for some foreign interests (maybe we should tell Corey). I wonder if Tommy ever had a Swiss Bank account.
But Daniel, why in the world would you think that if you post something it wouldn’t be discussed? I don’t understand. If you make a prediction, have a conversation, or switch political parties at the drop of the hat, and then post about it — it’s fair game. A lot of drama in your life Daniel — self-induced drama.
I agree Jack, the Corey story is just “an excuse.” Perhaps Corey just didn’t think there was a big enough audience for him here.
Keith,
There is NO DRAMA…
I just don’t like it when every comment or post I did here is scrutinized by you for your own political purpose which mainly includes bashing me.
Just using your own words to tell the truth Daniel. You just think it’s bashing.
I wasn’t familiar with Daniel’s alma mater, so I looked it up. Perhaps it gives us insight on why Daniel is so concerned about Romney’s Mormonism and perhaps why he is now a conservative? Daniel, I welcome your comments on whether your experience at Hillsong influenced you politically.
http://hillsongcollege.com/
I think EVERYTHING from Keith is BASHING so bad for him plus I can’t stand him.
Zreebs,
There are wonderful People at Hillsong College & Hillsong Church.
Our MEMO
The Church I See.
The Church that I see is a Church of influence. A Church so large in size that the city and nation cannot ignore it. A Church growing so quickly that buildings struggle to contain the increase.
I see a Church whose heartfelt praise and worship touches Heaven and changes earth; worship which influences the praises of people throughout the earth, exalting Christ with powerful songs of faith and hope.
I see a Church whose altars are constantly filled with repentant sinners responding to Christ’s call to salvation.
Yes, the Church that I see is so dependent on the Holy Spirit that nothing will stop it nor stand against it; a Church whose people are unified, praying and full of God’s Spirit.
The Church that I see has a message so clear that lives are changed forever and potential is fulfilled through the power of His Word; a message beamed to the peoples of the earth through their television screens.
I see a Church so compassionate that people are drawn from impossible situations into a loving and friendly circle of hope, where answers are found and acceptance is given.
I see a people so Kingdom-minded that they will count whatever the cost and pay whatever the price to see revival sweep this land.
The Church that I see is a Church so committed to raising, training and empowering a leadership generation to reap the end-time harvest that all its ministries are consumed with this goal.
I see a Church whose head is Jesus, whose help is the Holy Spirit and whose focus is the Great Commission.
Yes, the Church that I see could well be our Church – Hillsong Church.
What we believe:
http://myhillsong.com/what-we-believe
Hello.
As briefly as possible-
1. I did not say I would never post any comments on this site, although I don’t intend to keep up with what goes on here on a daily basis necessarily and I sort of think I get the most out of seeing lefties exclusively discussing and often fighting amongst themselves. I think I learn the most about you folks that way. I’ll probably comment from time to time though, and find it amazing that I remain such a topic of discussion.
2. james’ description of what he said about Romney being a foreign agent is not at all accurate, but he says so many things. odd and otherwise, on here, I can believe he might have just forgotten.
The example of not being “offended” by Kevin/GOPBS lunacy is different than not wanting to have my name be associated as a “partner” with this site. For one thing, I always said that the Kevin character was either someone putting on an act (like Roberto) or someone that was truly sick (and I sure got a lot of demented and threatening emails that sounded like they could have come from him in 2008). But if he had a website, I would not want my name or my small, personal blog associated with it. I’m not saying james is at that level, but I thought james did express a pretty fringe and ridiculous theory about Mitt Romney being a foreign agent who did not have loyalty to the United States, and while he has the right to that opinion/theory, I just would not want to be a highlighted contributor on a blog that would spout that anymore than I would on a Birther blog or one that questions the loyalty of Obama. I found much of what Ron Gunzburger believed to be deplorable, but I was never “featured” on his site beyond offering comments, nor would he ever have let me be featured (and jack, please, I was never a sock puppet there. The only times I did not post as Corey was when I would occasionally do One Minute Speeches as Jim Traficant)
In discussing politics on the internet, I have and will come across many people who hold views I find reprehensible, both to the left and to the right of me politically, but this is the only site where I have ever been a “featured partner”, with my name in bold in headlines, etc, and I think it is perfectly my right to decide I would rather have nothing to do with it in that regard. The fact is that very few people would want to be associated with something like this site.
3. I don’t know james personally, so not trying to have any rancor, but it’s just pretty hard for me to respect someone as a person who would question the very loyalty of Mitt Romney as an American (and don’t forget that Daniel, the new featured “Republican” here has called for Romney to be “deported” because of his religion.) I know there are people on the right who say terrible things about Obama, and as much as I dislike almost everything about Obama, I find it hard to respect those people either, and I would never want to be highlighted on their hosted sites either.
4. Too small of an audience here for me to waste time on? Perhaps in a way since it does save me a bit of hassle from having to email things to the host on a weekly or daily basis. People are free to read my rambling thoughts on my own blog (and comment) if they wish, but that’s up to you all. I think DSD is a very nice guy (extremely rare as compared to how so many of you come across online) and means well, but I would prefer that he not link my entire posts in full on here.
5. As many people have mentioned, this is sort of a dysfunctional site for many reasons. If it makes james happy to keep this up, that’s fine. I know I would not want to go to the efforts he does, but for a long time I excused all the stuff here, from the horrible spelling to the useless posts about topics nobody cared about, etc because I thought he was just a quirky guy doing the best he can with something for a hobby. But so much of the discussion here is indeed dominated by personal attacks and complaints about the site itself, and things featured that shouldn’t be featured, and people then getting offended at that, etc, etc.
There are lots of political blogs out there, both on the left and right, (but sadly not many featuring people of both persuasions as Politics1 used to be.) Eventually, I think people are going to wish james the best but decide there’s really no point in keeping all this going.
Catch you folks later.
Ok
It’s good to hear your side of the story
First
I need ANYBODY to find the part with me questioning
Mitt Romney ‘s loyalty as an AMERICA
I do do a lot of talking here but
I KNOW
I didn’t say that
Specificly I asked about money
I mention money , in connection with tax info….
In that sentence I mentioned we want to know if money could have come business or a country
You can take ANYWAY YOU WANT
BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE DID I SAY ROMNEY WAS
A FOREIGN AGENT
in addition I’ll point out that business people do work for many clients
That most certainly does not make them be holding
A prime example in William Jefferson Clinton
Who asks for money and favors for HIS Global initiative
EVERY YEAR
I was happy to feature you here Corey
But I’m NOT TAKING THE RAP FOR YOUR ABRUPT
DEPARTURE
Nor do I think much of anybody here does either
One would hope that you do find a was to come back to place
The consences is you added to discussion here….
As I always say
The choice is
YOURS
IT’s YOUR KEYBOARD
So Daniel, Let me ask you this. Why should people be penalized for what they believe? there are many really good people who do not believe in God. perhaps they don’t believe in God because they don’t always see justice that a good God would require. But whatever the reason, why should a non-believer be condemned to hell forever. that sounds evil to me.
I though Daniel was gonna slide on his post
Not to be,eh?
I agree
It is evil
But that is a general belief of Evangelical Christians who compose a large part of the base of the Republican Party
As to Corey
There IS a certain historical revisionism going on here about the supposed “civility” of Politics1
NOTHING could be further from the truth
The site was RIFE with ad hominem personal attacks on a daily basis
I think there is a certain yearning for the good ol days
That’s human nature
Not to let go of ones comfort zone and Corey felt comfortable there as there were a number of articulate conservatives to support him and his positions
Fine
But let’s have some accuracy please
And there was frequent discussion about the efficacy of the site as Gunzburger would threaten periodically to close it down
As to the Dog
He’s off the wall a lot
And I call him on it
Then again lots Of us are
Him,me and yes
Corey
Corey’s post comes across as rather pompous
Actually sort of Mitt Romneyish
You know a little like he’s an “observer” of those not quite up to his level
I guess is the final analysis as this will be f my final comment on him(unless we ever engage in a discussion on a topic during his infrequent visits here)
All this can be summed up in one word
WHATEVER!
Of course Politics1 was “uncivil”, in the comments, more so than this place. I’ve never said otherwise, but it had far more people, including those who from varied perspectives who had more to offer, and was a far more professional operation that served other purposes as compared to this site. It was a lot more structured and easier to follow conversations there as well I only commented there, I was not featured. That is all I would intend to do here.
And yes jack, in regards to talking about me here, perhaps you need to “get over it.” Break-ups happen, it’s not you, it’s, me, etc. etc.
Very insightful Jack. I do recall the days when Corey would claim “he ran Ron’s blog” — he also frequently questioned the patriotism of anyone who ever opposed Bush’s war in Iraq (of course while steadfastly refusing to pay higher taxes or join the war effort).
James has written many silly things on this blog — ruff, ruff and all, but he has never, like Corey has, questioned anyone’s patriotism. Corey was reaching and still is. He may be back if he thinks Romney can actually win this thing, but I doubt that.
On another front, Todd Akin says that he will stay in the Missouri Senate race. I just love rightwing Christian crazy ass candidates who think that God told them to run. His wife must be delighted — you go girl. I may call his campaign office and congratulate him on his wonderful decision.
The latest U.S.A. Today poll has Obama leading in the swing states. Perhaps a one point bump with Ryan on the ticket. Just wait until the noise machine starts talking about the Ryan/Akin abortion bill that basically makes it tougher for rape victims to get an abortion.
Speaking of crazy Christians. I understand that Hillsong has some priest like sex scandals in its past. A very controlling Church that, like its crazy counterparts here in the United States, gets way too involved in politics. I wonder if they have seperation of Church and State in Aussie land.
As many people remember, and as DSD has attested to here, there were a lot incidents at Politics1 of people posing as one another.
I said a lot of things there, going back back to 2004, and I am sure with the passage of time and age, there are things I probably wish I would not have said, but I am pretty certain that I never said I “ran Ron’s blog” or questioned anybody’s “patriotism” over foreign policy disagreements. I may have questioned their position or their judgment but not their patriotism. So, if Keith really thinks I said those things, I think it’s likely that it was an imposter.
Amen Jack…..
As one who got CONTIMUALLY BEAT down by GOPer’s on the Politics1 site I can confirm Jack’s ‘REVOLATION”
on the good ole days….
Shit It so crazy
Daniel up and CHANGED SIDES…..
WHATEVER!
Bullshit Corey, you clearly wrote it and then repeated it several times. As I recall very well, if someone did impersonate you, you were very quick to point it out. So while you have “outrage” that James “may” have questioned Willard’s patriotism, you clearly questioned anyone who didn’t support the Iraq war, especially the surge.
Careful James, Daniel will denounce you again for pointing out his switch-hitting political beliefs.
I agree that personal attacks were rampant on politics1. And there were other issues that don’t exist on pdog such as people pretending to be other people.
Corey clearly believes he is superior to us. but this is the same guy who admits that he admires Rush Limbaugh. and while I won’t defend everything James (or anyone else) says or believes, at least James has never said that Romney hates America or that Romney hates white people. yet Corey has no problems associating himself with Limbaugh.
And don’t act like saying that Obama was born in the US (where there are newspaper accounts) is particularly courageous. even most idiots know that.
Sorry Keith, I think you are off base on that, but I don’t know if you are really being serious or not.
I am told that in real life, you are enormously more “moderate” than the image you try to portray on here and that I would find you a very different, and more likable person outside of the internet, so I will just have to chalk statements like you make here up to you living out your online fantasies.
How do I associate with Rush Limbaugh? I’ve never spoken or communicated to him in any way. He has never “featured” me (obviously) and if I would certainly feel free to disagree with him over many things, as I do. Anyone who was a strong supporter of Mitt Romney, during the GOP primaries, as I was, pretty much had no use for Rush Limbaugh.
While I do check his website to see what he has been talking about, I do not listen to his show practically ever, and have not regularly since I was in High School.
Corey, What a fucking liar you are. I did say that Keith is more moderate in real life, but what is this crap about being more likeable in person? I like Keith in real life and on the Internet and I never said otherwise.
Keith……
YOU made my evening!
“On another front, Todd Akin says that he will stay in the Missouri Senate race. I just love rightwing Christian crazy ass candidates who think that God told them to run. His wife must be delighted — you go girl. I may call his campaign office and congratulate him on his wonderful decision.”
And Yea…
I’ll cop to writing crazy shit every once in a while
As Jack says…
We all do….
But People DO need to LIGHTEN up….
Hey….
He rode with me Keth…
Then he left standing ALL BY MYSELF….
I’ll NEVER forget that…
Zreebs, you said people are different online than they are in real life and you cited Keith and yourself. He is more far moderate and you are less confrontational, etc. That is what I got out of it, since I find Keith quite unlikable online. That it what I got out of it. I did not put anything in quotes. If you like, I can post exactly what you said in the email so there is no confusion.
I also think you are smart enough to know that there were issues regarding imposters on that site, and I totally disagree that I ever questioned anybody’s patriotism on Politics1. Keith accused me of saying those things back there on 2007 and 2008, so this is really reaching back into the playbook for him, (along with other things he did there such as questioning the sexual orientation of most Republicans he disagreed with and saying that he knew of various Republican pedophiles on Capitol Hill, etc), I never believed any of it. He likes to engage in fantasies.
He would say that I had made these accusations about liberals back in 2007 and 2008 on Politics1 and I always invited him to find the post where I said any of those things and he never did. So, I don’t consider him credible any more than I consider an idiot like Daniel G. credible.
Man….
A LOT OF
‘he said….No….He SAID’…. going on tonight!
Ok….
We Need a new Open Thread…..
I actually just got off the phone with Akin’s office. Congratulated them for “standing up for America and God’ – they thanked me and blessed me. Wow, straight to heaven for me.
As far as being “off base” – nope clearly I am not off base with this Corey. You did, in your defense of the so-called surge, questioned the patriotism of anyone who said they thought we should be out of Iraq.
I love the “someone must have been impersonating me” excuse, but they weren’t Corey. You used to come up with better ones than that.
My favorite Corey post was when he told us a mysterious aliment kept him from joining the military. I loved that one. It ranked right up there with Manila’s “there is radioactive sand in the Iraqi desert created when the weapons of mass destruction biodegraded.”
Tough to pick my favorite between those two.
But James, they aren’t going to lighten up — since I live in DC I am seeing all the commericals created for the swing states (Virginia). Trust me, it won’t lighten up.
I would consider myself more likable in real life than on the internet.
In real life, I’m a somewhat shy personality who sticks close to established friends.
Unless someone brings it up, I don’t talk politics.
I talk about music, as that’s a much less divisive subject than politics.
When I do talk politics, I try to be more calm, collected, and reasoned than I am in an online comments section.
Keith please keep us informed of things from the within the ‘Beltway’…..
I guess you are sensitive on the patriotism front, eh Corey?
I believe in disagreement and partisanship but I dislike questioning the motives, loyalty, or “patriotism” if you will of those who see things differently.
That is what you have done james in regards to Romney and that is what “jack” does when he says that all Republicans are motivated by “hate” (but yet he is big enough to somehow single me out as an exception) and I find it hard to respect people who would be so driven by partisanship or ideology (left or right) that they would do that. So, james, maybe all this politics stuff has changed you and the kind of person you come across as.Maybe you should give it all some thought, but that’s up to you.
Certainly, I am not perfect, and when I was younger I probably was even less perfect, but I know for a fact that I would never have said anybody who disagreed with the War in Iraq was “un-American” or “unpatriotic.” The only thing I can possibly think of is if anybody on the left, such as a Kevin/GOPBS would have taken glee with Americans being killed in a war they opposed as a means to end it and joyfully discussing the political implications of a bigger body count. If I criticized someone for doing that, I certainly do think that attitude is unpatriotic.
Corey, I didn’t save what I sent you, but I’m pretty sure I didn’t use the word enormously when describing Keith as being more moderate. Keith is definitely a liberal, but yes, I think he sometimes comes off as more leftist than he really is. But then, Keith has admitted on this site to voting for people Like Charles Percy, so I don’t think he is being deceptive in any way.
I’m convinced your comment was designed to incite.
Definitely was not trying to “incite” or cause any friction between Zreebs and his buddy/mentor. I never even used Zreebs name as my “source” or had any intention of doing so.
To stop any confusion here is exactly what was said:
“You are smart enough to recognize that many people interact on the Internet differently than how they interact in real life. I certainly include both myself and Keith in that category. Keith is enormously more “moderate” in real life than he is on the Internet. And I am much more confrontational on the Internet than in real life.”
Wow, Corey’s here
Wonder what his odds are on the MO Senate race now.
Of course he’d vote for Todd Akin no matter what.
I also wonder what he thinks of the yahoo freshman Republican who skinny dipped in the Sea of Galilee
Normally that would be a major story–thanks to Todd the Ass Hat this dope got a break.
But I’m sure it’s still a good day for the GOP right?
What is this crap about Keith being my mentor? Keith is a friend – not a mentor. I have no desire to be more like Keith, just as Keith has no desire to be like me. I certainly don’t agree with everything he says. Where did this mentor crap come from?
Zreebs, I think he is a bad influence on you, as you seem to be far more partisan and judgmental against those with whom you disagree ( paraphrase- Mitt Romney is a lousy person/how can anyone like or believe in him, etc) than what I used to remember or what you used to complain about regarding me. At least that is how you come across on this site.
Maybe there are other factors there and you are free to disagree of course.
People PLEASE go over to the new thread……..
Of course it’s designed to insight Zreebs. Corey must have been bounced from his other site or something — he seems so out-of-sorts this evening. Fact, Corey did question people’s patriotism on the P1 blog, and he did claim he ran the blog, in fact I had a good laugh with Ron on that one.
Clearly Corey was jealous of Ron, like I believe he is jealous of James. And he, like Daniel, refuses to believe I worked on Capitol Hill (but that didn’t stop him from trying very hard to find out what my last name was, or where I worked).
But, speaking of Capitol Hill. So many Republicans, so many closets. They still won’t come out when they should. Clearly afraid that the Teabaggers will come to get them. But, now that David Dreier, one of my favorite gay Members of Congress isn’t running for re-election, he is free to come out and marry his boyfriend Brad (aka his Chief of Staff). He will have to wait, of course, until they legalize marriage in California — but hey, he’s waited this long.
The word moderate has been used extensively tonight. As Barney Frank once said about Congressman Dreier when he failed, yet again, to be elected GOP majority leader because the Republicans thought Dreier was “too moderate’” Barney responded, “yes, in the sense that I marched in the moderate gay pride parade last summer and went to a moderate gay bar afterwards — David Dreier is too moderate.”
I wish David and Brad the best.
Sorry, I’m going to stay on this thread, as long as I continue to be on this site tonight. It’s easier to keep track of just one thread.
Scott, when I did my race of the day on the Missouri Senate race before all this happened I had it as “Leans Republican” I would change that as of today, but I seriously would plan to wait a while before we really get a sense of what happens.
I don’t really want to get into it here because it would take too long, and frankly you people are the “opposition”, but while Akin clearly made a political error, I am quite upset at the way that so many Republicans have quickly moved to throw him under the bus. I recognize that they see that as a political necessity, but I fear there may be other implications now and and in the future that are not good for us if we allow the left to roll over us in such a way.
I saw that Scott’s friend Dana Loesch is not going along with the chorus, but just about every Republican I have conversed with is of the opinion he has to go and could not possibly win now.
People are too obsessed with the news cycle and what is being said on Twitter and the blogs to have given this the proper perspective and it’s a pretty disheartening chain of events. I have no idea what will wind up happening in regards to one Missouri Senate race, that I certainly want my side to win, but I have to also think about other implications to all this.
I knew what Keith’s last name was when he emailed me several years ago, but I have no idea if it is really his last name or not.
Deep down, I think Zreebs is a good person, so I just think he could do better on the friend front, but it’s his life to live of course.
People are trying to talk to me on the new thread, but I am going to stay here, until I say goodnight, which will be pretty soon.
Yes james, people change. If you think you have changed for the better that’s your right. Not trying to incite anyone, and but with the exception of DSD, who is probably more to the left of all of you, there are a whole bunch of you on the left who come across as really lousy people online (though perhaps Daniel is the worst of anyone). Maybe you think the same of me, I’ll accept that as the nature of passionate political disagreement and why it’s maybe not workable for some conservatives and some liberals to be friendly on the internet during the heat of a campaign season.
The GOP has thrown Akin under the bus big time. you have to believe that some Akin Christan Right supporters have to be livid with Romney.
LOL @ the new PPP/Kos poll which still has Akin ahead today over McCaskill after all this today.
I said on another site earlier today that people (its not even Romney who was left with no choice but to say the things he did) who were so quick to throw him under the bus should at least wait for a poll. I said that my hunch was that if a poll was done, Akin will have lost ground but would still be ahead of 1-2 points. PPP has him up by 1, virtually no change from their last poll (while other polls have shown Akin up by a larger margin to begin with)
Conservatives were acting like he was Jerry Freaking Sandusky and was going to be immediately be down 20 points and make it impossible for every Republican in the country to win. Republicans needed to calm down and take a breath before they entered full panic mode over Akin. Maybe that can still be done now.
it is tough to have a civil conversation between liberals and conservatives. that is why I don’t discuss politics at work – and especially this time of the year.
but communicating and disagreeing in person is usually much more pleasant than communicating online.
james, I don’t have a “posse”, butt those people all disagreed with me over the Akin implications, so I should go see what they are saying about the new KOS poll showing Akin *exactly* with the same lead he had before, but as you know, I did try to get more Republicans to comment here (and I wish they would not have done that pretending to be liberals stuff) but if I am being honest, the general consensus was that this was an overly amateurish ghost-town site that they figured was not worth their time for either serious discussion or attempts to incite.
Too many bad things from Republicans have now been said about Akin for him to win.
Corey, what site is this posse on?
I think I learned my lesson about trying to introduce blogs to each other, so I won’t say the site here. It can be found, if someone really wanted to, but it’s for your own good to all the lefties here because those people would eat you up alive if you started arguing with them about politics or policy. They love to fight and call names, get personal/etc. You would really hate conservatives, because I am a choirboy compared to them, although I criticized them for being gutless today over the Akin thing
I thought you said that you don’t want to be associated with such sites?
The site owner on the other site is a very moderate Republican and basically just posts polls. He doesn’t say outrageous things.
There is a lot of rough and tumble stuff in the comments (mainly people fighting with each other over dumb stuff, but few are out of the mainstream politically) but I am certainly not “featured” there. All I do is comment. There are about 90-100 regulars at the site, 5 or so are on the left.
I can already anticipate that everyone who has been saying “Akin must go” is now going to say that PPP made up that result entirely today, showing him far stronger than expected, in order to make him stay in the race.
I guess that’s possible! Hopefully someone else, less agenda driven, is polling that race quickly.
Hedgehog Report?
“He, he, he
You know what Corey?
In spite of ALL the Bull Shit…
You LIKE us here…
You’re comfortable here…
And you’re fighting YOURSELF NOT being here…..
WTF are you doing that?”
Well, no actually I don’t like it here and continue to be very disappointed in you as a person james, but I realize you do not care.
Now, since you are goading me into trying to stick around, I am going to leave. I’ll weigh in sometime in the future, but not for a while.
Good luck all.